SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(HP) 18

CHET RAM THAKUR
Devta Chikhreshwar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
H.S. Thakur, for Petitioner; B. Sita-Ram, Advocate-General, for Respondents.

Judgement

ORDER:- This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by Devta Chikhreshwar through Shri Daulat Ram, Karta and President of the Temple of the aforesaid deity as a next friend for setting aside the order and judgment of the learned District Judge, dated 24th November, 1967, upholding the judgment and order of the learned Compensation Officer, Mahasu.

2. The petitioner's land vested under tie provisions of S.27 of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in the State Government on the passing of the Act. The petitioner alleges that he is a small landowner and he had applied to the Compensation Officer for giving him rehabilitation grant as he had no other land for his maintenance. But this application was opposed on the ground that the applicants viz., Daulat Ram and Mohan Lal were not competent inasmuch as they had no locus standi to file this application on behalf of the Devta. Further that the Rehabilitation Grant Rules were not applicable to the Devta. The learned Compensation Officer dismissed the application on the ground that Daulat Ram and Mohan Lal had no au











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top