SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(HP) 2

M.H.BEG
Moti – Appellant
Versus
Roshan – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Malhotra, for Appellant; Chhabil Dass, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- The plaintiff-appellant had sued for declaration and joint possession of land, 62 Bighas and 1 Biswa in area situated in Mauza Devki, Pargana Bharmour, in Khata No. 62 Khatauni No. 92 Khasra Nos. 1134, 1135, 1140, 1142, 1144, 1147 to 1150, 1166 and 1168. The only basis of his claim disclosed in the plaint dated 12-12-1957 was that he was entered as owner of a half of the above-mentioned land and that the defendants were entered as owners of the other half. The defendants, who are the sons of a man called Saraf and grandsons of Chand, denied the right and title of the plaintiff to any part of the land in dispute despite the entry of his name in the revenue records which according to the defendants, was erroneous. The plaintiff is a nephew of Chand mentioned above. He set up, in the course of evidence, a right flowing from a gift by Smt. Diukari, the widow of Chand, who was alive at the time when the suit was brought and is presumably still alive but was not examined as a witness. His case, taken up in evidence, was that Smt. Diukari, the step-mother of Saraf, had been given the land in dispute under a will made by Chand. It was also submitted that Smt. Diukari h





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top