SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(HP) 5

D.B.LAL
Roop Singh – Appellant
Versus
Nirmoo – Respondent


Advocates:
A.C. Sud, for Appellant; R.K. Gupta, for Respondent.

Judgement

D. B. LAL, J. :- This is an appeal under Order 43, Rule 1 of the Civil P. Code and is directed against the decision of the District Judge, Mahasu, whereby he has rejected the application of the appellant, Roop Singh, for grant of interim injunction under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil P. Code.

2. The facts of the case are, that Roop Singh, plaintiff, filed a suit for declaration in respect of landed property situated in various 'khewats' belonging to Chak Mau and some Khasra numbers of Chak Kiri, Pargana Shak as well as Chak Pojarli in Tehsil Chopal of the District of Mahasu. The allegation was, that Roop Singh is adopted son of one Ram Singh who was admittedly the owner of this landed property. It was stated that Roop Singh is in physical possession over the property, but Shrimati Nirmu and Shri Karam Singh, defendants, who are respondents before us, claim to possess title for the property, the former being daughter and the latter being brother of the deceased Ram Singh. They also got mutation in the revenue record in their favour. In this manner some cloud was cast upon the title of Roop Singh and he appeared before the Court for the relief of declaration that he wa








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top