SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(HP) 11

OM PARKASH
Land Acquisition Collector Mahasu – Appellant
Versus
Janki Dass – Respondent


Advocates:
Chhabil Dass Govt. Advocate, for Appellant; Tek Chand, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- This judgment will dispose of Miscellaneous First Appeals Nos.15 to 17, 19 and 20 and 22 to 26 of 1966. These appeals have been filed, by the Land Acquisition Collector, Mahasu, against the orders of the learned District Judge, Mahasu, passed in references, under S. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), made at the instance of various respondents, in the appeals. Though, the facts, in the appeals, are slightly different, yet the questions raised were one and the same and it will be convenient to dispose of all the appeals, by one judgment.

2. Lands, situated in Rohru town, were acquired, under the Act for public purposes. The Collector awarded compensation with respect to the acquisition of the lands. The respondents, in the present appeals, who were interested, as proprietors or tenants, in the lands, did not accept the awards of the Collector. They filed applications, containing objections against the awards. The main objection was that the Collector had assessed the market value of the lands at a low rate.

3. The Collector, at first, rejected the applications of all the respondents on the ground that the applications had been fi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top