ORDER :- This revision-petition is directed against an order of the learned Senior Subordinate Judge, Mandi, blowing an application of the respondent, for amending the plaint.

2. The respondent had instituted it suit, against the petitioners, for his issue of a mandatory injunction The allegations, in the suit, were that the property, in suit belonged to the Union of India, that the respondent had purchased the property at an auction sale, that the petitioners were the licensees of the properly and that the license of the petitioners determined on 23-3-1964 but they had not vacated the property. The respondent prayed for the issue of a mandatory injunction directing the petitioners to remove their goods, luggage and persons from the property and restraining them from interfering with the possession of the respondent.

3. The petitioners contested the suit, on various grounds. It is not necessary, for the decision of the revision petition, to set out all those grounds. Suffice it to say that the petitioners denied that the property belonged to the Union of India or that they were mere licensees. The petitioners pleaded that they were in possession of the property as tenants on