SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(HP) 12

OM PARKASH
Shushila Devi – Appellant
Versus
Dhani Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Kanshi Ram, for Appellant; Harish Chander, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- This appeal is directed against an order of the learned Senior Subordinate Judge. Bilaspur, awarding maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings, to the appellant.

2. The appellant had filed a petition, under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), for judicial separation, from respondent No. 1, her husband. She had also, moved an application, under Section 24 of the Act, for the grant of maintenance pendente lites and expenses of the proceedings. It was alleged, in the application, that the appellant was poor and had no independent income to support herself and for the necessary expenses of the proceedings and that respondent No. 1 was a rich man and his monthly income was Rs. 500/-. The appellant had prayed that she be granted maintenance of Rs. 100/- per mensem, pendente lite, and a sum of Rs. 500/-, as expenses of the proceedings.

3. The application was opposed, on behalf of respondent No. 1. It was denied that the appellant was poor and had no independent income for her support. It was alleged that the appellant was managing the entire property of her father, which consisted of considerable lands etc., and that,

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top