SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(HP) 15

OM PARKASH
Collector Bilaspur – Appellant
Versus
Lachhman – Respondent


Advocates:
Jai Chand Govt. Advocate, for Appellant; Harish Chander, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- The dispute, in this appeal, against an order of the learned' Additional District, Judge, Bilaspur, relates to the determination of the market value of land and non-fruit trees, belonging to the respondents, situated in village Kallar, which were acquired in connection with the construction of Bhakhra-Dam-Reservoir. The Collector had assessed compensation with respect to the land and trees. The award of the Collector was not accepted by the respondents. They filed objections against it. The objections were referred, for determination, to the Court.

2. The objections of the respondents, against the award, were that the market value of the land and trees had been assessed low and that the whole of the land acquired was kubli and its market value should have been assessed as such and that the Collector was in error in classifying the land into kubli, anderli awal, beharli awal, khoratar, banjer and gair-mumkin and evaluating each class at different rates.

3. The objections of the respondents were contested, on behalf of the appellant. It was pleaded that the land was correctly classified for purposes of evaluation and that the market value of the land and trees was

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top