SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(HP) 1229

SURJIT SINGH, SURINDER SINGH
DEEN MOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Ms. Kamlesh Shandil, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ramesh Thakur Assistant Advocate General.

JUDGMENT

Surinder Singh, J.-Appellant has challenged his conviction passed by the learned trial Court under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, in short ‘the Act’ whereby he has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of rupees one lac and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years, allegedly for possessing 5 kilograms of charas.

2. In short, prosecution case, as emerges from the evidence on record, can be stated thus. On 9.3.2006, PW13 Inspector SHO Jatinder Kumar was heading a Police patrol party. They put a ‘naka’ at the place known as “Jukianai-nullah” in District Chamba, H.P. Around 6.30 p.m., a vehicle bearing registration No. HP01-C-1-3004 (Bolero) came from Tissa side. It was stopped. PW1 Tejinder Singh and PW2 Chaman Lal were the occupants of the said vehicle. They were alighted and Police started searching the vehicle. In the meantime, they spotted the appellant coming from a short-cut to Shakti-Dehra link road, carrying a polythene bag in his hand. On seeing the Police party, he tried to escape but was nabbed by them at a short distance. The Police associated



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top