HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.B. MISRA, A.C.J. & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHARMA, JJ.
HIMACHAL PRADESH NIZI VYAVSAYIK PRISHIKSHAN KENRDA SANGH
Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS.
Respondents
CWP No.2948/2008
Decided on 12-8-2009
Vocational Training Centres - State Council for Vocational Training - National Trade Certificate Notification Committee, National Council for Vocational Training, State Council for Vocational Training - 1. National Trade Certificates, 2. Standards for syllabi, equipment, and duration of courses, 3. Inspection of training institutions, 4. Recognition of training institutions, 5. Qualifications for technical staff, 6. Conditions for award of National Trade Certificates, 7. Additional training facilities, 8. Distribution of contribution towards expenditure on Craftsmen Training Scheme, 9. Functions under the Apprentices Act, 1961 - The court discussed the functions and standards prescribed by the National Council for Vocational Training and the State Council for Vocational Training, and their influence on the decision.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's association sought direction to hold admission tests for vocational training courses and sponsor candidates to vocational centres approved by the State Council for Vocational Training. The State Government had initially permitted the courses but later changed its decision, leading to the petition.
Finding of the Court:
The State Government's decision to deny running certain courses was arbitrary and unreasonable, violating Article 14 of the Constitution. The court upheld the petitioner's legitimate expectation and quashed the Cabinet's decision, directing the State to prepare a schedule for counselling for the courses and re-inspect the institutions.
Issues: The main issue was the change in the State Government's decision regarding the running of vocational courses, leading to the deprivation of the petitioner's association from running certain courses.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the State Government's decision was arbitrary and unreasonable, violating Article 14 of the Constitution. It also upheld the petitioner's legitimate expectation based on past practice.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, the Cabinet's decision was quashed, and the State was directed to prepare a schedule for counselling for the courses and re-inspect the institutions. The petitioner's association was also awarded costs.
Per Rajiv Sharma, J.-The present petition has been filed by the association of the Vocational Training Centres (VTCs) through its President. The necessary resolution was passed by the association authorizing the President to file the present petition on 19.11.2008. The petitioner’s association is seeking direction to the respondents to hold admission test for admitting the students in State Council for Vocational Training courses for the session 2007-08 and also to consequently sponsor the candidates to the Vocational Centres approved by the State Council for Vocational Training.
2. Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has strenuously argued that once the institutions represented by the petitioner’s association have been permitted to run the vocational courses, the State Government is estopped from changing the rules in the middle of the game. In other words, his submission is that once the members of the petitioner’s association have spent huge amount for opening the vocational centres as per the norms prescribed by the State Government, it is incumbent upon the State to hold admission test and thereafter sponsor the candidates to the members of the petitioners institution. He then argued that the committees constituted by the State Government have already inspected the premises of the members of the petitioner’s association and had recommended various courses, including Art and Craft, Physical Training Instructor, Library Science and Ayurveda Pharmacist, on the basis of the infrastructure and wherewithal,. He lastly contended that the action of the State Government not to permit the members of the petitioner’s association in Art and Craft, Physical Training Instructor, Ayurveda Pharmacist and Library Science is arbitrary.
3. Mr. P.K. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr.P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General have supported the various decisions of the State Government on the ground that it is the duty cast upon the State Government to ensure quality education.
4. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and have gone through the pleadings carefully.
5. The Government of India has appointed a committee called ‘the National Trade Certificate Notification Committee’ on the basis of the recommendations of the All India Council for Technical Education in the year 1951. The recommendations made by the committee were accepted by the Central Government. The Central Government in consultation with the State Government constituted a body called “National Council for Vocational Training” (NCVT) in the year 1956. The National Council for Vocation Training has to discharge the following functions:
1. “establish and award National Trade Certificates in engineering, building, textile and leather trades and such other trades as may be brought within its scope by the Government of India;
2. prescribe standards in respect of syallabi, equipment, and scale of accommodation, duration of courses and methods of training;
3. arrange trade tests in various trade courses and lay down standards of proficiency required for a pass in the examination leading to the award of National Trade Certificate;
4. arrange for ad hoc or periodical inspections of training institutions in the country to ensure that the standards prescribed by the council are being followed;
5. recognize training institutions run by government or by private agencies for purposes of the grant of National Trade Certificates and lay down conditions for such recognition;
6. co-opt, if necessary, any person or persons to advise the council in connection with its work;
7. prescribe qualification for the technical staff of training institutions;
8. prescribe the standards and conditions of eligibility for the award of National Trade Certificates;
9. generallycontrol the conditions for the award of National Trade Certificates;
10. recommend the provision of additional training facilities wherever necessary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.