SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(HP) 804

SURJIT SINGH, SURINDER SINGH
STATE OF H. P. – Appellant
Versus
GIAN CHAND – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. For the Respondent:Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Surjit Singh, J.(Oral)-State has appealed against the judgment dated 14th October, 1994 of learned Sessions Judge, Una, whereby respondents Gian Chand, Rajinder Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar and Ravi Dutt, who were charged with and tried for offence, under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, have been acquitted.

2. Prosecution case, which led to the trial of the respondents, may be summed up thus. On 20th October, 1992 around 12.30 a.m., when PW-2 Inspector Sita Ram, SHO, Police Station, Sadar Una, alongwith PW-1 SI Kishori Lal and some other police officials, was present at a place called Teuri Bridge on Una-Amb Road, in connection with routine patrolling, a Maruti Van (Taxi) bearing registration No. HPY-1470, appeared from Amb side. It was got stopped for checking. One polythene bag, green coloured, containing Charas like stuff was found, under the rear seat, which was occupied by respondents Gian Chand, Sanjeev Kumar and Ravi Dutt. Respondent Rajinder Kumar was in driver’s seat. The stuff smelt like Charas. It was seized. On weighment, it was found to be 500 grams. 10 grams Charas was separated by way of sample. The sample and the bulk Charas were m








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top