SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(HP) 118

DEEPAK GUPTA, V.K.AHUJA
STATE OF H. P. – Appellant
Versus
RAGHUBIR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr.R.K.Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. For the Respondent:Mr.A.K.Gupta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Per Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral)-The State has filed this writ petition against the order of the learned Tribunal whereby a direction has been given to grant work charge status to the applicant from the date he completed 10 years of service with 240 days in each calendar year within a period of six months from the date of the order passed by the Tribunal.

2. The question as to which employees are covered by the scheme of regularization approved by the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of H.P & others, 1994 Supp(2) SCC 316 was considered by us in a detailed judgment in Gauri Dutt and ors. Vs. State of H.P, 366 LHLJ 2008(1). We had held that all those employees who had worked for at least one year prior to 31.12.1993 are covered by the said scheme. Admittedly the respondent in this case had completed 240 days of service prior to the said date. Therefore, this case is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by us in Gauri Dutt’s case supra. Therefore, there is no error in the order of the learned Tribunal. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.

3. In view of the dismissal of the main petition, all the pending CMPS, if any, shall stand dispose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top