RAJIV SHARMA, SURJIT SINGH
STATE OF H. P – Appellant
Versus
NEHRU SINGH – Respondent
Surjit Singh, J.(Oral)-By means of this appeal, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, State has sought modification of the judgment, dated 22.9.1997 of learned Sessions Court to the extent that the respondent is held guilty, convicted of and punished for offences, under Sections 332 and 333 IPC instead of offences, under Sections 323 and 325 IPC, as ordered by the trial Court.
2. Case was registered against the respondent at the instance of Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Chowari, who made written complaint Ext. PE. FIR is Ext. PF. As per Ext. PF, respondent went to a store of Public Works Department at Chowari on 7.9.1992 at 6.30 p.m. and picked up a piece of wood from the store and with that piece of wood, he hit PW-3 Duni Chand, a regular Chowkidar and PW-4 Mukhtyar Singh, a daily waged Chowkidar, who were on duty at that time. Both, PW-3 Duni Chand and PW-4 Mukhtyar Singh were got medically examined. Duni Chand was found to have sustained a simple injury on the outer aspect of left arm, in the shape of a red contusion. Mukhtyar Singh had three injuries, two of which were - a contusion and an abrasion, which were simple and one was grievous,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.