Sangita Devi vs State of H. P. - 2011 Supreme(HP) 598

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2011 Supreme(HP) 598

RAJIV SHARMA
Sangita Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioner:Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate.
For the respondents:Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 6.
None for respondents No. 7 and 8.

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sharma, Judge

In view of the contents of reply, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2011 Supreme(HP) 598

RAJIV SHARMASangita Devi – AppellantVersusState of H. P. – Respondent

RAJIV SHARMA
Sangita Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent