RAJIV SHARMA
Vipin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). This revision petition is directed against the order dated 19.5.2010 of the Appellate Authority (II), Una in Rent Appeal No. 3/2009.
2. Material facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that the respondent-landlord (hereinafter referred to as ‘the landlord’ for convenience sake) filed the eviction petition against the petitioner-tenant (hereinafter referred to as the tenant for convenience sake) on the following grounds: . “That the respondent is in arrears of rent from June, 2002 till date @ Rs. 1065/- per month. 2. That applicant is also entitled for 10% increase after every five years from the date of commencement of tenancy i.e. 1.8.1988, in following manner:- I. 1.8.1993 to 31.7.1988 @ 10% i.e. Rs. 88. Enhancement 88/-=60x80=0048000. II. 1.8.1998 to 31.7.2003 @ 10% i.e. 968/- Enhancement 168x60=10,080/-. III. 1.8.2003 to 28.2.06 @ 10% Rs. 1065/- Enhancement 265x31=Rs. 8215/- with interest @ 9% P.A. on arrears of rent. 3. That the tenant/respondent has ceased to occupy the rented shop for a continuous period of twelve months without reasonable cause i.e. from 1st September, 2004.”
3. The tenant filed detailed reply controv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.