SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(HP) 1228

V.K.AHUJA
Vinay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the petitioner:Mr. M.S. Guleria, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant A.G.

JUDGEMENT

V.K. Ahuja, J. This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner, under Section 397 readwith Section 401 Cr.P.C. against the judgment of the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Una dated 23.5.2009, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 48/2008, wherein the appeal of the petitioner filed under Section 341 of Cr.P.C. was dismissed against the order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Court No. 1, Amb.

2.Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Lakhbir Singh had filed a complaint under the provisions of Sections 341, 323, 325, 506 readwith Section 34 of IPC against several persons which was pending trial before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amb. On 7.3.2008, an application was moved on behalf of the complainant Lakhbir Singh, through his counsel, for taking up the case before the date fixed of hearing alleging that as the accused were his neighbours and to maintain cordial relations, they have compromised the matter. On the same day, an application was also moved seeking permission to compound the case. A compromise deed allegedly signed by complainant Lakhbir Singh was also produced before the Court. The case was allowed to be







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top