SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(HP) 676

KURIAN JOSEPH, P.B.MISHRA
DEVINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SHIMLA – Respondent


Advocates: ANKUSH DASS SUD, J.K.Verma, R.K.BAVA, S.C.Sharma, Sanjeev Bhushan,

JUDGMENT

KURIAN JOSEPH, C. J.

( 1 ) WHETHER the election petition filed under Section 163 of the H. P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, hereinafter called "the Act" should be dismissed by the Authorized Order for the only reason that the petition is not furnished in the prescribed manner, is the question that arises for consideration in this appeal.

( 2 ) SHORT facts. Election to the post of pradhan, Gram Panchayat, Munish Bahli in district Shimla was held on 22nd December, 2005. The writ petitioner and the third respondent (parties are described as they appeared in the writ petition) had contested the election. The petitioner was declared elected, having secured 283 votes. The third respondent filed an election petition mainly on the ground that the petitioner was not qualified to be elected. The petitioner raised a preliminary objection that the election petition had not been filed in the manner prescribed under Section 164 of the Act and the Rules. However, disregarding the objection, the matter was considered on merits and the election was set aside by order dated 22nd January, 2007. The appeal before the Deputy commissioner was dismissed on 24th April, 2007 and thus the writ petition.

(












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top