Rajiv Sharma, Judge.

Material facts necessary for adjudication of this petition are that in sequel to the interviews held with effect from 21.4.2003 to 26.4.2003, the petitioner was appointed as Shashtri in the pay-scale of ` 5000-8100 vide office order dated 18th September, 2003. Petitioner’s services were terminated vide annexure A-1, dated 29th October, 2004.

2. Mr. P.P. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner has strenuously argued that his client belongs to I.R.D.P. category and has been rightly considered against the same pursuant to which he has been appointed as Shashtri on 18th September, 2003. He also contended that regular inquiry was required to be held against the petitioner before the issuance of Annexure A-1, dated 29th October, 2004.

3. Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has vehemently argued that the services of the petitioner have been terminated in view of the terms and conditions of appointment letter issued vide office order dated 18th September, 2003. He has relied upon condition Nos. 1, 13 and 20.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the pleadings carefully.

5. Petitioner has relied upon I.R.D.P. cert