M.R.VERMA
Dev Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
M.R. Verma, Chairman
1. The applicant being aggrieved by office order Annexure A-1 transferring her from Shimla to Rampur has filed this original application seeking the relief that the Respondents may be directed to cancel the impugned order and that the order dated 9.3.2005 may be quashed and set aside.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of this original application are that the applicant is working as Instructor, Cutting and Tailoring, Industrial Training Institute (W) Shimla and Respondent No. 4 was working as Instructor, Stenography (Hindi), but she was rendered surplus therefore, after training as Instructor, Cutting and Tailoring was ordered to join as such at Rampur. However, she preferred O.A. No. 2131/2005 which was ordered to be treated as a representation vide order Annexure R-3 dated 1.9.2005 passed by a Division Bench of this Tribunal. On consideration of such representation Respondent No. 2 adjusted Respondent No. 4 in Shimla and transferred the applicant to Rampur. Case of the applicant is that Respondent No. 4 was once transferred to Jubbal where she did not join and was again transferred to Rampur and she did not join there and being influential succeeded
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.