SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(HP) 494

SANJAY KAROL
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Nirmala Devi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjay Karol, J.

1. Shri Vinod Kumar, driver and his father Shri Ram Chand, transferee of the vehicle in question have filed the present appeal invoking the Appellate jurisdiction of this Court under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act'), challenging the legality, validity, propriety and the correctness of the Award dated 30.9.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (II), Una, H.P. in M.A.C. Petition No. 59 of 2001 titled as Nirmala Devi v. Vinod Kumar and Ors.

2. Smt. Nirmala Devi, respondent No. 1 herein (in short claimant), filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, claiming compensation for the death of her daughter Ms. Sharmila Devi, aged 17 years, who died in an accident with Maruti Car No. DAQ-1638 on 7.5.2001. Compensation of Rs. 10 lacs was claimed.

3. Shri Vinod Kumar (in short the driver) while admitting that he was driving the vehicle in question at the relevant time denied any negligence and further pleaded that he was engaged as driver by the transferor Shri Iqbal Singh (in short the transferor), respondent No. 2 herein.

4. Shri Ram Chand, (in short the transferee), vide separate reply denied any liability f






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top