SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(HP) 742

SANJAY KAROL
Simmi Karol – Appellant
Versus
R. K. Madan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjay Karol, J.

1. Petitioner herein is the judgment-debtor and has filed the present petition for review of the judgment dated 23.4.2008 passed by this Court in RSA No. 450 of 2007, titled as Simmi Karol v. R.K. Madan and Anr. Petition is accompanied by an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure being CMP (M) No. 1168 of 2008, seeking condonation of delay in filing the review petition. The delay is of 187 days. On 8.1.2009 notice was issued to the respondents on the application. The decree-holders have opposed the application.

2. The petitioner herein is referred to as defendant-licensee and the respondents herein are referred to as plaintiffs-licensors. Whether the reporters of Local Papers are allowed to see the Judgment?

3. In terms of licence deed dated 30.6.2002 entered into between the plaintiffs and defendant, the plaintiffs premises situated on The Mall, Shimla was given on licence @ Rs. 40,000/- per month with effect from July, 2002. With the licence period expiring on 30.6.2003 and the defendant failing to hand over the possession of the premises to the plaintiffs, Civil Suit No. 61-1/2003, titled as R.






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top