V.K.AHUJA
Kamlesh Rani – Appellant
Versus
Balwant Singh – Respondent
V.K. Ahuja, J.
1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant under Section 100 of the CPC against the judgment and decree, dated 15.12.1999, passed by the learned District Judge, Sirmour at Nahan, vide which he reversed the judgment and decree, dated 17.1.1998, passed by the learned Senior Sub Judge, Sirmour at Nahan.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the appellant, hereinafter after also referred to as the plaintiff, filed a suit for possession of the property comprised in Khasra Nos. 790, 791 and 792, measuring 86.62 square meters, situated in Mohal Rajinder Nagar, as against the respondent, hereinafter also referred to as the defendant. It was alleged by the plaintiff that the land in question was owned by Maharaja Rajinder Parkash, who was succeeded by his two widows, two daughters and mother Rajmata Mandalsa Devi. It was further alleged that on the death of Rajmata Mandalsa Devi, she was succeeded by Smt. Prem Lata Devi, daughter of Maharaja Amar Parkash and two daughters and widows of Maharaja Rajinder Parkash. It was further alleged that Smt. Prem Lata Devi, wife of late Maharaja Natwar Singh, sold the property in question to the plaintiff f
1. Karuppan v. Ponnarasu Ambalam AIR 1965 Mad 389;
3. Girraj Kishore v. Dr. Trilokinath Vimal AIR 1988 All 305;
4. Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani and Anr. v. Indusind Bank Ltd. and Ors. AIR 2005 SC 439;
5. Vidhyadhar v. Mankikrao and Anr. AIR 1999 SC 1441;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.