SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(HP) 944

V.K.AHUJA
Kamlesh Rani – Appellant
Versus
Balwant Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V.K. Ahuja, J.

1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant under Section 100 of the CPC against the judgment and decree, dated 15.12.1999, passed by the learned District Judge, Sirmour at Nahan, vide which he reversed the judgment and decree, dated 17.1.1998, passed by the learned Senior Sub Judge, Sirmour at Nahan.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the appellant, hereinafter after also referred to as the plaintiff, filed a suit for possession of the property comprised in Khasra Nos. 790, 791 and 792, measuring 86.62 square meters, situated in Mohal Rajinder Nagar, as against the respondent, hereinafter also referred to as the defendant. It was alleged by the plaintiff that the land in question was owned by Maharaja Rajinder Parkash, who was succeeded by his two widows, two daughters and mother Rajmata Mandalsa Devi. It was further alleged that on the death of Rajmata Mandalsa Devi, she was succeeded by Smt. Prem Lata Devi, daughter of Maharaja Amar Parkash and two daughters and widows of Maharaja Rajinder Parkash. It was further alleged that Smt. Prem Lata Devi, wife of late Maharaja Natwar Singh, sold the property in question to the plaintiff f




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top