SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(HP) 969

DEV DARSHAN SUD
Ram Asra – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Dev Darshan Sud, J.

1. The Petitioner challenges his conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner Ram Asra and one Gurmukh Singh were convicted by the trial Court to undergo sentence of imprisonment for various terms:

Convict No. 1 Ram Asra

i) He will undergo simple imprisonment for 3 (three) months for the offence punishable under Section 279, IPC.

ii) Convict No. 1/Ram Asra shall undergo rigorous imprisonment for one and a half (one and half) year for the offence punishable under Section 304-A, IPC along with fine to the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand only).

The above sentences of substantive imprisonment shall run concurrently.

Convict No. 2. Gurmukh Singh

i) Convict No. 2 shall undergo rigorous imprisonment for one and half year along with fine to the sum of Rs. '5,000/- (five thousand only) for the offence-punishable under Section 304-A, IPC.

2. Two appeals were preferred, one by the Petitioner herein and second by the other accused Gurmukh Singh.

3. Learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, acquitted Gurmukh Singh, but convicted the Petitioner and reduced the period of imprisonment to three months.

4. The brief facts, necessary for determinati
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top