Deepak Gupta, J . 1. This petition is directed against the order dated 22.5.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ghumarwin whereby he dismissed the application filed by the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the wife) for review of the order dated 2.11.2007.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner Geeta Devi was married to Lekh Ram. It appears that their relations after marriage were not good and this compelled Geeta Devi to file an application on her own behalf and on behalf of her children for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. On 17.9.1986 this petition was disposed of on the statement of the parties. In his statement, the husband agreed to handover the possession of his land and house to the wife Geeta Devi in lieu of maintenance. On this basis, the petition was disposed of and the husband had specifically agreed to give full control of his house and land to his wife Geeta Devi for her maintenance. Geeta Devi in turn agreed that she would not destroy the property in any manner. Further, the husband agreed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.60/- per month to each of five children through the mother. This proposal was agreed