SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(HP) 2172

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Deepak Gupta, J.
New India Assurance Company..Appellant.
Versus
Tika Ram and others.…Claimants.
FAO No. 185 of 2010
Decided on: 9.5.2011

Advocates appeared:
For the appellant:Mr. B.M Chauhan, Advocate.
For the respondents:Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3.

The interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act highlighted the distinction between driving a two-wheeler and a four-wheeler, emphasizing the separate categories for motor cycles and light motor vehicles.

Headnote:

Driving License - Entitlement to Drive Two Wheeler - Motor Vehicles Act, Section 2(10), 2(21), 2(27), 3, 9(6), 10 - The court discussed the definitions of driving license, light motor vehicle, and motor cycle under the Motor Vehicles Act. It highlighted the distinction between driving a two-wheeler and a four-wheeler, emphasizing the separate categories for motor cycles and light motor vehicles. The court also referenced previous judgments to support the interpretation that a person holding a license for a four-wheeled vehicle is not entitled to drive a two-wheeler without a separate license or endorsement.

Fact of the Case:

The appeal questioned whether a person holding a license for a light motor vehicle is entitled to drive a two-wheeler scooter or motor cycle.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that a person holding a license for a four-wheeled vehicle is not entitled to drive a two-wheeler without a separate license or endorsement.

Issues: Entitlement of a person holding a license for a light motor vehicle to drive a two-wheeler scooter or motor cycle.

Ratio Decidendi: The distinction between driving a two-wheeler and a four-wheeler, as well as the separate categories for motor cycles and light motor vehicles, influenced the court's decision.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the award was modified, and the Insurance Company was held not entitled to pay the awarded amount. No costs were awarded.

JUDGMENT:

Deepak Gupta, J(oral).

The only question which arises in this appeal is whether a person holding a licence entitling him to drive a light motor vehicle is also entitled to drive a two wheeler scooter or motor cycle or not?

2. Mr. B.M. Chauhan, learned counsel for the Insurance Company, has contended that a person holding a driving license for L.M.V. which has four wheels is not entitled to drive a motor vehicle of two wheels for which a separate license or endorsement is required. In support of her submission, learned counsel has referred to the definition of `driving license’ in Section 2(10) of the Act which reads as follows:--

“2(10) “driving licence’ means the licence issued by a competent authority under Chapter II authorizing the person specified therein to drive, otherwise than as a learner, a motor vehicle or a motor vehicle of any specified class or description; Reference has also been made to the definition of light motor vehicle in Section 2(21) which reads as follows:-

“2(21) “light motor vehicle” means a transport vehicle or omnibus the gross vehicle weight of either of which or a motor car or tractor or road-roller the unladen weight of any of which, does not exceed 7500 kilograms.”

Motor Cycle has been defined in Section 2(27) of the Act as follows:

“2(27) “motor cycle” means a two-wheeled motor vehicle, inclusive of any detachable side-car having an extra wheel, attached to the motor vehicle.”

Section 3 of the Act makes it necessary for a person to have driving license. Section 3(1) of the Act reads as follows:-

“3(1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle in any public place unless he holds an effective driving license issued to him authorizing him to drive the vehicle; and no person shall so drive a transport vehicle (other than a motorcar or motor cycle) hired for his own use or rented under any scheme made under sub-section (2) of Section 27 unless his driving license specifically entitles him so to do.”

A driving license is issued under Section 9 of the Act. Section 9(6) of the Act provides as follows:-

“9(6) The test of competence to drive shall be carried out in a vehicle of the type to which the application refers:

Provided that a person who passed a test in driving a motor cycle with gear shall be deemed also to have passed a test in driving a motor cycle without gear.”

Section 10 of the Act prescribes the form and contents of driving license. It reads as follows:

“10. Form and contents of licenses to drive.-(1) Every learner’s license and driving license, except a driving license issued under Section 18, shall be in such form and shall contain such information as may be prescribed by the Central Government.

(2) A learner’s license or, as the case may be, driving license shall also be expressed as entitling the holder to drive a motor vehicle of one or more of the following classes, namely:-

(a) motor cycle without gear;

(b) motor cycle with gear;

(c) invalid carriage;

(d) light motor vehicle;

(e) transport vehicle;

(i) road roller;

(j) motor vehicle of a specified description.”

Rule 16 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules provides that the driving license should be in Form 6 or

7. Relevant portion of Form 6 which is the form for issue of driving license reads as follows:- “The holder of this licence is licensed to drive throughout India vehicles of the following description:-Motor cycle without gear Motor cycle with gear Invalid carriage Light motor vehicle Transport vehicle Medium passenger motor vehicle”

3. A scooter has not been defined under the Motor Vehicles Act and a scooter will fall under the definition of Motor Cycle, as quoted above. In Section 2(21) light motor vehicle has been defined to mean a transport vehicle or omnibus or motor car or tractor or road-roller with a weight of above 7500 kilogram. It is pertinent to note that all the vehicles included are four wheeled vehicles and a motor cycle has not been included in the definition of L.M.V. This stands to reason also. A person






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top