SURINDER SINGH
Kishan Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
Surinder Singh, J:
The present jail appeal has been received from the Superintendent of District Jail Chamba, which has been directed by the appellant (hereinafter to be called as accused) being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Sessions trial No. 20 of 2010, decided on 6.7.2010/24.7.2010 whereby he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment under the following different Sections as hereunder:
Sl.No. Offence Sentence
under Section
1. 376 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for
seven years and fine of
Rs.50,000/- and in default of
payment of fine, simple imprisonment for one year.
2. 363 IPC Simple Imprisonment for three
years and fine of Rs.5,000/-and in
default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for one year.
3. 366 IPC Simple imprisonment for five years
and fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of
payment of fine, simple imprisonment for one year.
4. 342, IPC To pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of
payment of fine, simple imprisonment
for one month.
5. 506 IPC Simple imprisonment for one year and
fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment
of fine, simple imprisonment for one
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.