SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(HP) 1

C.B.CAPOOR
Shankar Dass – Appellant
Versus
Mahu Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L. Aukta, for Petitioner;
S.K. Malhotra, for Respondents.

ORDER :

This reference has been made by the learned Sessions Judge Mahasu recommending that the order made by the learned Magistrate Second Class Kotkhai discharging the respondents of an offence under S. 448 read with S. 109 of I. P. C. be vacated.

2. A complaint had been filed against respondents by Shankar Dass for an offence under S. 448 read with S. 109 of I. P. C. in the Court of Magistrate Second Class Kotkhai. On 5-4-1962 the complainant was absent and on that ground the learned Magistrate discharged the respondents in exercise of the powers conferred by S. 259 of Cr. P. C. An application in revision against that order was filed before the learned Sessions Judge on the grounds that the order of discharge was illegal and the complainant was present outside the Court room throughout the day but the case was not called on for hearing. While the Sessions Judge did not accept the complainant's version as to his being present he was of the opinion that as the offence with which the respondents were chargeed was a cognizable one the provisions of S. 259 of Cr. P. C. were not attracted and accordingly he submitted the reference under consideration. Section 259 of Cr. P. C. reads as b














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top