SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(HP) 3

T.RAMABHADRAN
LILA DHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Kedar Ishwar, D. N. Vaidya

Judgment

T Ramabhadran, CJ

[1] The appellant, who was formerly employed as a booking-clerk in the Himachal Pradesh Government Transport at Mandi, was tried by the learned Special Judge of Mandi of an offence under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The charge framed against the appellant was that between 26-4-1954 and 26-6-1954, he had misappropriated, or otherwise converted to his own use, 12 sums of money; totalling Rs. 3,355/9/9. The appellant pleaded not guilty, but adduced no defence.

The learned trial Judge came to the conclusion that the offence was brought home to the appellant only in respect of five items; totalling Rs. 948/13/16, As regards the remaining items, the learned Judge was of the opinion that the prosecution had failed to prove its case. In the result, the appellant was sentenced to imprisonment till the rising of the Court and to pay a fine of Rs. 400/-; in default, four months' rigorous imprisonment. Hence, this appeal.

[2] Arguments in the appeal were heard yesterday. For reasons to be stated shortly, I am of the opinion that the appellant was rightly convicted, although, in the matter of fine, I feel that some leniency might be shown to th

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top