SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(HP) 439

DEV DARSHAN SUD
Neeeraj Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Kulbhushan Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the petitioner:Sh.Hamender Chandel, Advocate.
For Respondent.:Mr.Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate.

Judgment

Dev Darshan Sud, J.

1. The wife, who is the petitioner, has preferred this petition against the order passed by the learned trial Court in application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It was pleaded before the learned trial court that the petitioner herein, had been forced to leave matrimonial home for the reason as pleaded by her which inter alia included physical and mental cruelty. It was pleaded that the respondent, who is the husband and petitioner before the trial court, is not supporting their daughter. It was pleaded that his earning was Rs.70,000/-per month including private tuition work etc. The non-applicant husband was also possessed large tracts of agriculture land in Janerghat/Chail from where he is deriving income of more than Rs. 25,000/- per month. The petitioner claimant was serving as Librarian in the Indian Institute of Advance Studies where she take home salary was Rs. 21,000/- and she has no other means to support her daughter. She claimed a sum of Rs.55,000/- for litigation expenses. On contest, the learned trial Court holds that the non-applicant is admittedly a central government employee earning Rs.21,000/- per month and there was













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top