KULDIP SINGH
Bhadri – Appellant
Versus
Suma Devi – Respondent
Kuldip Singh, Judge
1. This appeal is directed against judgment, decree dated 24.4.2001 passed by learned District Judge. Mandi, in Civil Appeal No. 34 of 1997 affirming judgment, decree dated 25.2.1997 passed by learned Senior Sub Judge, Mandi in Civil Suit No. 91/90 (187/92).
2. Smt. Narvada daughter of Ghungar, mother of respondents had filed a suit for declaration and joint possession against appellants and one Hima that Will dated 28.1.1988 of late Ghungar in favour of appellants No. 1 and 2 is wrong, illegal and void. The further pleaded case was that suit land measuring 71-15-13 bighas in Mauza Panyali/146 Illaqua Bagra was recorded in the joint ownership and possession of Ghungar deceased and Hima. Smt. Narvada and appellant No.3 are the daughters, appellant No.1 is widow and appellant No.2 is son of deceased Ghungar and are entitled to inherit his estate.
3. Ghungar father of Smt. Narvada was an old man and he used to remain ill and was confined to bed for more than one year prior to his death. Ghungar was also not in sound disposing state of mind on account of his illness. Ghungar died on 1.11.1988. The appellant No.1 claimed to have inherited alongwith appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.