SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(HP) 17

CHOWDHRY
Baijnath – Appellant
Versus
Ram Nath – Respondent


Advocates:
Das Raj-for Appellant ; Ved Vyas - for Respondents,

Judgement - Chowdhry, J.C. :- These are two second appeals by the defendant Baijnath arising out of two separate suits in both of which the plaintiffs were the same, Tholia and his son Ram Nath, Tholia having died, his son Brahm Nath has been brought on record as his legal representative in the second appeal. The brothers Ram Nath and Brahm Nath are thus the plaintiffs-respondents in both these appeals.

2. Both the suits were dismissed by the trial Court but decreed on appeal by the District Judge of Chamba. The present second appeals were thereupon filed by Baijnath in the Court of the Chief Judge of Chamba. Under Notfn. No. J. 79-15/48, dated 14-1-1949, read with S. 36, Chamba State Courts Act, the Chief Commissioner of Himachal Pradesh referred to the Judicial Committee for its opinion cases that were pending in the Chief Court of Chamba. That is how these second appeals are now before me as Judicial Committee.

3. The two suits were for recovery of value of offerings made on the occasion of Navamala ceremonies, corrupted in local parlance into Nawala ceremonies. The ceremony in one case was performed at the house of one Ashwani Kumar and in the other in that of one Mataditta, and









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top