SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(HP) 40

CHOWDHRY
Girdhari Lal – Appellant
Versus
Spedding Dinga Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
D.N. Aggarwal, for Appellant; R.N. Malhotra, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- This is a defendants appeal against the Judgment and decree of the learned District Judge of Mandi, dated 28-3-1951, decreeing the suit of the plaintiff-respondent for Rs. 15,335/14/3.

2. The suit was as by a buyer against a seller for recovery of excess of sums advanced over value of goods supplied, plus interest. The suit was based on two contracts of even date, 26-5-1947, under one of which the defendant agreed to supply 100 tons of wheat, and under the other 20 tons of rice, to the plaintiff firm at its godown in Chamba before the expiry of the month of June 1947, the qualities of the commodities and the rates at which they were to be supplied being specified. The plaintiffs case was that the sums advanced to the defendant totalled Rs. 60,000/- and that the defendant supplied goods worth Rs. 43,478/5/9 and repaid Rs. 3,500/- in cash. The suit was therefore for recovery of the balance Rs. 13,021/10/3, plus Rs. 5,130/10/- interest at the contract rate of Rs. 18/12/- per cent per annum, total Rs. 18,152/-.

3. The defendant admitted execution of the two contracts but pleaded that he did so as an agent He admitted receipt of Rs. 60,000/- from the plaintiff but contended th









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top