CHOWDHRY
Girdhari Lal – Appellant
Versus
Spedding Dinga Singh – Respondent
2. The suit was as by a buyer against a seller for recovery of excess of sums advanced over value of goods supplied, plus interest. The suit was based on two contracts of even date, 26-5-1947, under one of which the defendant agreed to supply 100 tons of wheat, and under the other 20 tons of rice, to the plaintiff firm at its godown in Chamba before the expiry of the month of June 1947, the qualities of the commodities and the rates at which they were to be supplied being specified. The plaintiffs case was that the sums advanced to the defendant totalled Rs. 60,000/- and that the defendant supplied goods worth Rs. 43,478/5/9 and repaid Rs. 3,500/- in cash. The suit was therefore for recovery of the balance Rs. 13,021/10/3, plus Rs. 5,130/10/- interest at the contract rate of Rs. 18/12/- per cent per annum, total Rs. 18,152/-.
3. The defendant admitted execution of the two contracts but pleaded that he did so as an agent He admitted receipt of Rs. 60,000/- from the plaintiff but contended th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.