RAMABHADRAN
Shero – Appellant
Versus
Chamaru – Respondent
2. The land in dispute, measuring 3 acres 6 kanals and 17 marlas, situated in village, Chakla, belonged to Jeotia, father of respondents 1 and 2. On 23rd Phagun, 1960 B., Jeotia mortgaged this land with conditional sale (ba bilwafa) in favour of one Mussadi in lieu of Rs.120/-. The mortgage was for the period of one year and it was stipulated that in case the mortgage amount was not repaid within that period, the mortgage would be considered as a sale. In point of fact, the money was not repaid within that period. On 20th Chet, 1963 B., Mussadi applied to the Collector for grant of a patta. The application was not opposed by Jeotia. Patta was, however, granted to Mauza and Mali, who claimed to be of Jeotias family and objected to the land passing to a stranger. Consequently, they were granted the patta on payment of Rs.120/- to Mussadi.
3. On 25th Magh, 2002 B., the plaintiffs, i.e. Chamaru and Birbal, sons of Jeotia
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.