SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(HP) 8

RAMABHADRAN
Shero – Appellant
Versus
Chamaru – Respondent


Advocates:
Ved Vyas Mahajan, for Appellants; Des Raj Mahajan, for Respondents (Nos.1 and 2).

JUDGMENT:- This is a second appeal by three defendants against the decision of the learned District Judge of Chamba, whereby he set aside the decision of the Subordinate Judge, Chamba, and granted the plaintiffs-respondents a decree for possession of the land in dispute.

2. The land in dispute, measuring 3 acres 6 kanals and 17 marlas, situated in village, Chakla, belonged to Jeotia, father of respondents 1 and 2. On 23rd Phagun, 1960 B., Jeotia mortgaged this land with conditional sale (ba bilwafa) in favour of one Mussadi in lieu of Rs.120/-. The mortgage was for the period of one year and it was stipulated that in case the mortgage amount was not repaid within that period, the mortgage would be considered as a sale. In point of fact, the money was not repaid within that period. On 20th Chet, 1963 B., Mussadi applied to the Collector for grant of a patta. The application was not opposed by Jeotia. Patta was, however, granted to Mauza and Mali, who claimed to be of Jeotias family and objected to the land passing to a stranger. Consequently, they were granted the patta on payment of Rs.120/- to Mussadi.

3. On 25th Magh, 2002 B., the plaintiffs, i.e. Chamaru and Birbal, sons of Jeotia


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top