SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(HP) 14

C.B.CAPOOR
Dittu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Amar Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
R.N. Malhotra, for Petitioner; K.C. Pandit for M.L. Auktar for Respondent.

ORDER :- This application in revision by Dittu Ram is directed against an order of Shri T.C. Rewal, the then Senior Subordinate Judge, Mahasu. 2. The respondent had filed a suit for rendition of accounts and dissolution of partnership against the petitioner. Subsequent to the filing of the written statement, leave to amend the plaint was granted and an amended plaint was put in on 30-5-1960 and the petitioner was required to file a written-statement by 20-6-1960. A replication was filed by the respondent and an objection was raised that the petitioner had in the supplementary written-statement put forward pleas which were inconsistent with some of the pleas put forward in the written statement initially filed and were foreign to the fresh matter introduced on amendment of the plaint. That objection prevailed with the learned trial Court and by the order sought to be revised the new and inconsistent pleas raised by the petitioner were directed to be ignored.

3. A preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the respondent that the application in revision does not lie. I, however, do not propose to go into that objection as the application in revision does not appear to have mer





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top