SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(HP) 173

RAJIV SHARMA
PREM PARKASH KHATRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.K. PAUL, MEENAKSHI SHARMA, NEERAJ K. SHARMA

JUDGMENT

RAJIV SHARMA -

1. Petitioner was appointed as Artist Modeller on 2.06.1966 in the pay scale of Rs.120-10-250/-. He joined his duties on 10.06.1966. The pay scale of Rs.120-250/- was revised w.e.f. 01.02.1968 to Rs.250-25-550/-. On further revision, the pay scale was revised to Rs.620-1200/- w.e.f. 01.01.1978. The petitioner was placed in the pay scale of Rs.1500-2640/- w.e.f. 01.01.1986. In the State of Punjab, 50% of the posts of Artist, Modeller/Artist-cum-Modeller were placed in the pay scale of Rs.2000-3500/- and were designated as Senior Modellers as per notification, dated 21.08.1990. The petitioner made a representation for placing him in the pay scale of Rs.2000-3500/- on Punjab pattern. Case of the petitioner was strongly recommended by the respondent No. 2 to respondent No. 1 by referring to the notification, dated 21.08.1990 on 17.03.1997. The same recommendations were reiterated by the Director, Medical Education, Himachal Pradesh vide letter, dated 27.07.2000. The respondent No. 3 has also strongly recommended the case of the petitioner on 05.09.2002. The Director, Medical Education, Himachal Pradesh again recommended the case of the petitioner on 12.09.2002. Th














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top