SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(HP) 381

DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY
RAKESH THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
P.D.NANDA, VIRENDER VERMA, PUSHPENDER JASWAL, DUSHYANT DADWAL

JUDGMENT

DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY, J.

1. BY means of this writ petition, the following relief has been sought:-

i) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, being eligible, for promotion to the post of Research Officer in accordance with the existing R&P Rules without any further delay. ii) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus restraining the respondents from amending the existing R&P Rules to the disadvantage of the petitioner."

2. THE grouse of the petitioner as has been brought to this Court in the present writ petition is that though he is eligible in accordance with Recruitment and Promotion Rules for promotion to the post of Research Officer, however, not considered without any rhyme and reason. Also that the proposal for amendment in the Recruitment and Promotion Rules made to the 1st respondent being illegal may be quashed and that the respondents be restrained from amending the Recruitment and Promotion Rules.

The petitioner on his appointment as Research Assistant is working as such w.e.f. 4th February, 2004 on the establishment of the 2nd respondent. The next chann






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top