RAJIV SHARMA
Naresh Panwar – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
Per Rajiv Sharma, Judge:
The respondent-Commission issued advertisement No.XII/2009, dated 12.3.2010, whereby applications were invited from the candidates for the post(s) in different Departments of Himachal Pradesh on the prescribed application forms. Last date of receipt of applications was 12.4.2010. According to subject-wise details of vacancies for different categories, 12 posts of Lecturer (College Cadre) Class-1 (Gazetted) in Computer Applications, on contract basis, were also notified. The petitioners and respondent No.3 submitted their applications in the prescribed format for considering their candidature to the respondent-Commission. Candidature of petitioner No.1 was rejected by respondent-Commission. Petitioners No. 2 to 5 were issued call letters, pursuant to which they were called for interview. Candidature of respondent No.3 was also rejected by respondent-commission. He approached this Court by way of CWP No.1322/2010. Fact of the matter is that, respondent No.3 was also permitted to appear in the interview. He was selected as per result declared vide Annexure P-4. His name was recommended by respondent-commission to respondent No.1.
2. Mr. Sanjeev Bhusha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.