RAJIV SHARMA, SURESHWAR THAKUR
Bhupinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
Justice Rajiv Sharma, J.
The appellant-accused has infact filed two appeals against the judgment dated 19.3.2010, bearing Cr. Appeal No. 143 of 2010 and Cr. Appeal No. 490 of 2010. The Registry should not have accepted the second appeal bearing Cr. Appeal No. 490 of 2010, preferred by the same person against the judgment dated 19.3.2010. Cr. Appeal No. 490 of 2010 is thus dismissed, being not maintainable.
Cr. Appeal No. 143 of 2010.
2. This appeal has been instituted against the judgment dated 19.3.2010 and consequent order dated 22.3.2010, rendered by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Hamirpur, in Sessions Trial No. 4 of 2010, whereby the appellant-accused (hereinafter referred to as the accused), who was charged with and tried for offences under Sections 376, 452 and 323 IPC, has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of three months under Section 452 of the IPC and also sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.