IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
P.S. Rana, J.
Reeta Devi daughter of Shri Devki Nand - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others - Respondents
CWP No. 3672 of 2012
Decided on : 23rd January, 2015
grant-in-aid - Education - Parents Teachers Association Rules 2006 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the grant-in-aid to Parents Teachers Association Rules 2006 and its application to the petitioner's case. The court highlighted the principles of appointment of regular teachers and the authority responsible for such appointments under Recruitment and Promotion Rules.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought grant-in-aid and arrears of salary from April 2007, and absorption as a language teacher in a government school under the PTA policy. The respondents contested the petitioner's eligibility for grant-in-aid and appointment as a language teacher.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was entitled to grant-in-aid as per the Parents Teachers Association Rules 2006, but her request to be absorbed as a regular language teacher was declined.
Issues: 1. Entitlement for grant-in-aid and arrears of salary from April 2007. 2. Entitlement to be absorbed as a regular language teacher under the PTA policy.
Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner was found eligible for grant-in-aid as per the Parents Teachers Association Rules 2006, but her request to be absorbed as a regular language teacher was declined due to the appointment authority for regular posts being different from the PTA authority.
Final Decision: The court partly allowed the petition, quashing the order denying grant-in-aid and ordering the release of arrears. The petitioner's request to be absorbed as a regular language teacher was declined.
P.S. Rana, J.
Order Present civil writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India pleaded therein that petitioner passed her matriculation examination from H.P. Board of School Education Dharamshala in the year 1999. It is pleaded that thereafter petitioner passed her Plus two from H.P. Board of School Education Dharamshala in the year 2001 and petitioner passed her degree of Bachelor of Arts from H.P. University in the year 2004 and passed her M.A. from H.P. University in the year 2009. It is further pleaded that thereafter notification was issued by the Government to appoint the teachers under PTA scheme on dated 29.6.2006 and one post of language teacher was lying vacant in Government Senior Secondary School Majheoti Sub Tehsil Nankhari Tehsil Rampur District Shimla H.P. for which Deputy Director (Elementary) gave permission to fill up the vacant post in April 2006. It is further pleaded that as there was no language teacher in the school the PTA decided to appoint the petitioner and passed a resolution on this behalf in May 2006 and thereafter petitioner submitted her joining in Government Senior Secondary School Majheoti Sub Tehsil Nankhari Tehsil Rampur District Shimla H.P. on dated 22.5.2006. It is pleaded that after joining her duties in Government Senior Secondary School Majheoti Sub Tehsil Nankhari Tehsil Rampur District Shimla H.P. grant-in-aid has not been paid to the petitioner till date and thereafter petitioner passed her Prabhakar from H.P. University in April 2007 and as such she is eligible and qualified for release of grant-in-aid since April, 2007. It is pleaded that the Principal did not forward the case of petitioner for release of grant-in-aid and petitioner approached the Deputy Director (Elementary) Shimla for issuing directions to the Principal for sending her case and on receiving instructions from Deputy Director (Elementary) Shimla the Principal of School applied for release of grant-in-aid w.e.f. April 2007 onwards and subsequent reminders were also given but grant-in-aid was not released. It is pleaded that petitioner came to know that grant-in-aid denied to petitioner as per Annexure P-10 which is an order of Principal Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh dated 26.8.2011 vide order No. EDN-C-E(2)38/11. It is pleaded that denial of grant-in-aid to the petitioner is violation of Article 14 of Constitution of India because similarly situated teachers have been granted grant-in-aid and respondents denied the benefits by violating Article 14 of Constitution of India. It is pleaded that order passed by Principal Secretary (Education) to the Government of H.P. dated 26.8.2011 Annexure P-10 be quashed and grant-in-aid be granted to the petitioner. It is further pleaded that writ of mandamus be issued directing the respondents to absorb the petitioner in Government Senior Secondary School Majheothi Sub Tehsil Nankhari Tehsil Rampur District Shimla H.P. under PTA policy and further direct the respondents for issuance of grant-in-aid and arrears of salary from retrospective effect i.e. from April 2007.
2. Per contra reply filed on behalf of respondents Nos. 1 to 3 pleaded therein that Government of H.P. after considering the shortage of staff in various school framed grant-in-aid to Parents Teachers Association Rules 2006 vide notification dated 29.6.2006. It is further pleaded that directions were issued by the Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 2919 of 2006 titled Jasbir Singh and others vs. State of H.P. and in compliance to the directions instructions were issued to all Principals to comply the order passed in OA No. 2919 of 2006 by Hon’ble H.P. Administrative Tribunal. It is pleaded that petitioner was appointed by Parents Teachers Association after passing the resolution on dated 22.5.2006 purely on remuneration of `1200/-per month to be paid from PTA fund prior to the notification of grant-in-aid Rules without following procedure. It is pleaded tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.