RAJIV SHARMA, SURESHWAR THAKUR
Jeevan Rana – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Per Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral).
This appeal is instituted against the judgment dated 29.9.2011 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mandi in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2010, whereby the appellant-accused (hereinafter referred to as the “accused” for convenience sake), who was charged with and tried for offences punishable under section 376 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he was further directed to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the commission of offence punishable under section 376 (2) (f) of the Indian Penal Code. He was further sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months for the commission of offence punishable under section 451 of the Indian Penal Code. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
2. Case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is that the grand father of the prosecutrix filed an application before the police on 5.4.2010 stating there
Sheralli Wali Mohammed vs. State of Maharashtra
Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar v. The State of Gujarat
Nalini Kumari vs. K.S. Bopaiah 2007 (1) KarLJ 342
Sudhakaran vs. State of Kerala 2010 (10) SCC 582
Hari Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh 2008 (16) SCC 109
Dahyabhai v. State of Gujarat AIR 1964 SC 1563
Sherall Walli Mohammed v. State of Maharashtra: (1972 Cr.LJ 1523 (SC) Elavarasan V. State
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.