RAJIV SHARMA
Shriram General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Leela Vati – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, J.
This appeal is instituted against the award dated 31.8.2013 rendered by the Commissioner under Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923, Karsog in W.C. Pet. No. 2 of 2011.
2. “Key facts” necessary for the adjudication of this appeal are that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 instituted a petition for the grant of compensation under section 22 of the Workmen Compensation Act against the appellant as well as respondent No.3- Paras Ram Bansal. Respondent No.1 is the mother of deceased Prem Singh and respondent No.2 is the father of deceased Prem Singh. Prem Singh was deployed as a Driver of ill-fated truck of respondent No.3. The truck met with an accident on 22.12.2009 at 11.30 P.M. Prem Singh died on the spot. The post-mortem was conducted at C.H. Karsog. FIR was registered. Prem Singh was 21 years old at the time of accident. His salary was Rs. 4,500/- per month and despite that he was also paid a sum of Rs. 120/- as daily diet money by respondent No.3. Thus, his salary was Rs. 4500+3600 = Rs.8,100/- per month.
3. Petition was contested by the owner of the truck. He has admitted that deceased Prem Singh was employed as a Driver. The accident was caused due to mechanical defect
Project Officer, Basudeopur Colliery vs. Dhaneswari Devi
Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Srinivas Sabata
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mubasir Ahmed
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mohd. Nasir
Saberabibi Yakubbhai Shaikh and others vs. National Insurance Company Limited and others
New India Assurances Co. Ltd. Vs. Harshad Bhai Amrut Bhai Modhiya and another [(2006) 5 SCC 192]
Manju Sarkar and others vs. Mabish Miah and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.