RAJIV SHARMA
Gulshan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, J.
The petitioner was deputed to drive the departmental vehicle from Shimla to Kalka. According to the petitioner, when he was coming back from Kalka to Shimla, he got down from the vehicle. He was overpowered by some unknown persons. He was drugged by them. Some person dropped him at his residence. He regained consciousness and found himself at his residence on 6.10.2004. The fact of the matter is that the vehicle of the petitioner met with an accident on the evening of same day at Kacchi Ghati, Shimla, causing loss to the tune of Rs. 59,190/-. The petitioner neither reported the matter to the police nor apprised the Department.
2. The disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under Rule 14 of CCS(CCA) Rules 1965, vide memorandum dated 2.12.2014. The petitioner filed a detailed reply to the same vide Annexure P-5 dated 10.12.2014. The Inquiry Officer was appointed. The Inquiry Officer submitted the report to the Disciplinary Authority. The Inquiry Officer gave findings that the delinquent official drove the vehicle in a negligent manner, resulting in the accident on 5.10.2004. The version of the petitioner that some unidentified persons hav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.