IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rajiv Sharma And Sureshwar Thakur, JJ.
State of Himachal Pradesh - Appellant
Versus
Khem Singh - Respondent
Cr. Appeal No. 578 of 2008.
Decided on : 28.10.2015.
Acquittal - Circumstantial Evidence - Indian Penal Code - Sections 302, 201
Fact of the Case:
The State of H.P. appealed against the acquittal of the accused of charges under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence, including the recovery of the deceased's body and related items, and witness testimonies.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove each link in the chain of circumstances. The court highlighted the lack of evidence to support the motive for the accused to murder the deceased, the reliability of witness testimonies, and the recovery of items. The court also noted the absence of crucial evidence, such as fingerprint comparison and distance analysis, leading to the conclusion that the guilt of the accused was not unfailingly proved.
Issues: The issues revolved around the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence, the establishment of motive, the reliability of witness testimonies, and the absence of crucial evidence such as fingerprint comparison and distance analysis.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that for a case based on circumstantial evidence, each link in the chain of circumstances must be proven. The lack of evidence to support the motive, the unreliability of witness testimonies, and the absence of crucial evidence led to the conclusion that the guilt of the accused was not unfailingly proved.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the acquittal of the accused. The court found no merit in the appeal and maintained the impugned judgment.
Sureshwar Thakur, Judge
The instant appeal is directed by the State of H.P. against the judgment of the learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. rendered on 26.05.2008 in Sessions Trial No. 23/2007, whereby, the learned trial Court acquitted the accused/respondent of the charge of his having allegedly committed offences punishable under Sections 302, and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the prosecution case are that on 3.3.2007 Sh. Bhagat Ram, brother of Beli Ram reported the matter in the Police Station, Gohar that Beli Ram is his elder brother. They are three brothers and he is the youngest one. The family members of his brother Beli Ram is residing at Thacha-dhar, but his brother Beli Ram has also purchased land at Mub-Kotmoras and has also constructed residential house there. His brother Beli Ram is a contractor of Forest Corporation, who had taken the work at Bagodh on contract and has employed the labourers for sawing and carriage. Sh. Prem Singh S/o Sh. Parshu Ram, R/o Village Khali-dhar whose house is situated at a distance of 150-200 feet from the residential house of his brother Beii Ram at Mub Kotmoras has given information to him on telephone that on 28.2.2007 around 7.30 A.M. his brother Beli Ram had left the house alone on foot from Chandeh path carrying with him licenced gun, green colour bag and umbrella. On receiving the information on telephone on 2.3.2007 from the Police Station, Gohar that one bag of green colour was found near C.D. Block Bank at Dari in which the articles of his brother Beli Ram were found and on this he along with his relatives had gone for search of his brother Beli Ram but till date his whereabouts are not known. Mobile phone No.94181-64594 of his brother Beli Ram is not responding. Sh. Bhagat Ram has identified the bag and documents of his brother Beli Ram. He suspected that his brother Beli Ram might have been killed or kidnapped by someone as the financial condition of his brother is sound. On the report of Sh. Bhagat Ram, FIR No.39/2007 for the offence punishable under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code was registered at Police Station, Gohar. The police carried out investigation into the case. The accused was arrested on 4.3.2007 by the police. During the course of interrogation he made a disclosure statement under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act to the effect that he had murdered the deceased. On 5.3.2007, the accused after visiting the jungle Jawal demarcated the place where he had hidden the dead body of Beli Ram in presence of the witnesses and the same was taken out therefrom and taken into possession by the police. The police has also taken photographs and video film while the dead body was being taken out from the pit. The dead body was identified by Bhagat Ram to be of his brother Beli Ram. On examination of the dead body, it was noticed that there was gun shot near the left eye and ear of the deceased Beli Ram. Form the spot, the blood stained leaves and earth were taken into possession by the police. The accused has also got recovered the gun and umbrella from the heap of 'Chalaru' in the field which was near his house. The khakha of gun was prepared on the peace of cloth. The accused has also recovered the gold ring, three live cartridges which were also taken into possession by the police and the same were packed in a parcel and sealed with seal K. The police got conducted the postmortem examination of the body of the deceased and the viscera which was preserved by the Doctor, Zonal Hospital, Mandi along with gun, blood stained earth were sent to FSL, Junga for chemical analysis.
3. On conclusion of the investigation, into the offences, allegedly committed by the accused, a report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was prepared and filed in the competent Court.
4. The accused was charged by the learned trial Court for his having committed offences punishable under Sections 302
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.