TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Dinesh Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Kavita – Respondent
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
This revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge-I, Solan, on 23.04.2015 whereby he awarded maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs. 7,000/- per month alongwith litigation expenses at Rs. 10,000/- to the respondent.
2. The relationship between the parties is not disputed and the petitioner has only questioned the basis upon which the learned Court below awarded the maintenance.
3. It is vehemently contended by Shri Ramakant Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Basant Thakur, Advocate that before passing the impugned order, it was incumbent upon the Court below to have taken into consideration the pleadings and other material placed on record and only after weighing the same, passed the impugned order.
4. In support of his submissions, reliance has been placed upon the judgment passed by the Bombay High Court in Smt.Gangu Pundlik Waghmare versus Pundlik Maroti Waghmare and another AIR 1979 Bombay 264 and judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Nishan Singh versus Bhupendra Kaur 1985 (2) HLR 321.
5. I do not think that there could be any quar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.