SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(HP) 1478

RAJIV SHARMA
Champa Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Manju Mamik – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

RAJIV SHARMA, J.

1. This petition is instituted against the order dated 29.6.2015, rendered by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dalhousie, District Chamba in CMA No. 57 of 2009.

2. Key facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that the petitioner-plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff), has filed suit for specific performance of contract dated 14.9.1998 and permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents-defendants (hereinafter referred to as the defendants). During the pendency of Civil Suit, the sole defendant expired on 23.2.2004. The ex-parte decree was passed by the trial Court on 23.7.2005. The plaintiff filed an application for setting aside the abatement and bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased defendant. The defendants challenged the order of setting aside the abatement before this Court by filing Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 4233 of 2013. The same was dismissed vide order dated 26.8.2014. The defendants moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the written statement. The reply was filed by the plaintiff. The application was allowed by the learned trial Court on 29.6.201
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top