RAJIV SHARMA
Champa Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Manju Mamik – Respondent
RAJIV SHARMA, J.
1. This petition is instituted against the order dated 29.6.2015, rendered by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dalhousie, District Chamba in CMA No. 57 of 2009.
2. Key facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that the petitioner-plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff), has filed suit for specific performance of contract dated 14.9.1998 and permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents-defendants (hereinafter referred to as the defendants). During the pendency of Civil Suit, the sole defendant expired on 23.2.2004. The ex-parte decree was passed by the trial Court on 23.7.2005. The plaintiff filed an application for setting aside the abatement and bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased defendant. The defendants challenged the order of setting aside the abatement before this Court by filing Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 4233 of 2013. The same was dismissed vide order dated 26.8.2014. The defendants moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the written statement. The reply was filed by the plaintiff. The application was allowed by the learned trial Court on 29.6.201
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal and Others vs. K.K. Modi and Others
Baldev Singh and Others vs. Manohar Singh and Another
Ma Shwe Mya vs. Maung Mo Hnaung
Usha Balashaheb Swami and Others vs. Kiran Appaso Swami and Others
B.K. Narayana Pillai vs. Parameswaran Pillai
Baldev Singh and Others vs. Manohar Singh
L.J. Leach and Co. Ltd. vs. Jardine Skinner and Co. AIR 1957 SC 357
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.