RAJIV SHARMA, SURESHWAR THAKUR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Shankar Lal Sharma – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, J.
This petition is instituted against the judgment rendered by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench in Original Application No. 283HP2009, dated 02.06.2010.
2. Key facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that the respondent superannuated/retired from All India Radio, Shimla on 26.09.1992. He falls in the area not covered under the Central Government Health Scheme (hereinafter referred to as “CGHS” for the sake of brevity). He was given fixed medical allowance of Rs. 100/per month. He remained under treatment from Indira Gandhi Medical College and Associated Hospitals, Shimla. He was advised to undergo surgical procedure for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG). The doctors referred him to Prime Heart and Vascular Institute, Mohali. He remained admitted as an indoor patient from 03.06.2008 to 17.06.2008, i.e., for 15 days. He incurred an expenditure of Rs. 1,79,559/on his treatment. He also incurred an additional sum of Rs. 20,000/towards post operation follow up, medicines and transportation charges. He submitted medical bills for reimbursement of medical expenses. However, the claim of the respondent was rejecte
B. N. Nagarajan v. State of Mysore
Akadasi Padhan v. State of Orissa
Randhir Singh v. Union of India
R. Abdullah Rowther v. State Transport, etc.
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation
State of H.P. v. Umed Ram Sharma
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Chandra Mohan Nigam & Ors.
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association & Ors. v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.