SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 74

P.S.RANA
Payal – Appellant
Versus
Manish Chaudhary – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist :Mr. S.C.Sharma, Advocate.
For the Non-Revisionist :Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate.

ORDER :

P.S. Rana, Judge.

Present civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 15.10.2014 passed by learned Additional District Judge-II Shimla in maintenance pendente lite application No. 83-S/6 of 2014 filed in divorce petition No. HMA 71-S/3 of 2014 titled Manish Chaudhary vs. Payal Sharma.

Brief facts of the case

2. Shri Manish Chaudhary filed divorce petition No. HMA 71-S/3 of 2014 titled Manish Chaudhary vs. Payal Sharma under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act 1955 on account of cruelty and desertion. It is pleaded that marriage between the parties was solemnised at Shimla on 27.11.2010 as per Hindu rites and customs. It is pleaded that on 19.5.2011 Smt. Payal Sharma without consent and knowledge of Manish Chaudhary shifted to her parents house at Shimla and refused to return to her matrimonial house. It is pleaded that Smt. Payal Sharma did not perform any marital obligations and also used to become violent. It is pleaded that behaviour of Smt. Payal Sharma did not improve despite best efforts on the part of Manish Chaudhary. It is pleaded that Smt. Payal Sharma also took her entire clothes and entire jewellery worth Rs.10 lacs (Rupees ten lacs only). It is pleaded th
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top