RAJIV SHARMA, SURESHWAR THAKUR
Nanak Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, J.
1. Present appeal has been filed against Judgment dated 5.1.2011 rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mandi, HP camp at Karsog in Sessions Trial No. 7 of 2010, whereby appellant-accused (hereinafter referred to as accused for convenience sake), who was charged with and tried for offence under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as Act for convenience sake), has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for twelve years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,20,000/- and, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment, for two years.
2. Prosecution case, in a nutshell, is that PW-11 SI Amar Singh, PW-9, Constable Pitamber, PW-2 Constable Jitender, HC Jagdish, LC Neelam and HHC Bodh Raj were present at Dhurmu on 29.11.2009 at 5.15 PM. Accused came from Kelodhar side carrying a backpack (Ex. P2) on his back. He was stopped. A truck bearing registration No. HR-37-A 5120 came from Kotlu, which was signalled to stop. Prem Singh was driving the said truck. Prem Singh was associated as a witness. Accused disclosed his name as Nanak Chand. Accused appeared to be frig
State of Punjab vs. Balbir Singh
State of Punjab vs. Baldev Singh
K. Mohanan vs. State of Kerala
Joseph Fernandez vs. State of Goa
Prabha Shankar Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Krishna Kanwar vs. State of Rajasthan
Manohar Lal vs. State of Rajasthan
Karnail Singh vs. State of Haryana
Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja vs. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.