SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 177

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Rajiv Sharma and Sureshwar Thakur, JJ.
State of Himachal Pradesh - Appellant
Versus
Hukam Singh - Respondent
Cr. Appeal No. 83 of 2016
Decided on : 16-03-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M.A.Khan, Addl. AG.
For the Respondent: Nemo.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of maintaining proper records and following procedures for the safe custody of case property, as well as the requirement for the prosecution to establish a strong case beyond reasonable doubt.

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Acquittal - Section 20 of the ND & PS Act - [Section 20 of the ND & PS Act] - The court discussed the provisions of Section 20 of the ND & PS Act and the rules related to the safe custody of case property. It highlighted the importance of maintaining proper records and following procedures to ensure the integrity of case property. The interpretation of the rules and their application influenced the court's decision to dismiss the appeal.

Fact of the Case:

The prosecution charged the accused with possession of charas under Section 20 of the ND & PS Act. The prosecution's case relied on the testimony of witnesses and the recovery of the charas from the accused. The trial court acquitted the accused, leading to this appeal.

Finding of the Court:

The court found discrepancies in the prosecution's case, including doubts about the identity of the recovered charas and the lack of independent witnesses. It also highlighted the failure to follow proper procedures for the safe custody of case property. As a result, the court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's decision to acquit the accused.

Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of the prosecution's evidence, the integrity of the recovered charas, and the adherence to rules for the safe custody of case property.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the failure of the prosecution to establish a strong case against the accused, including doubts about the identity of the recovered charas and the lack of adherence to rules for the safe custody of case property.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the trial court's decision to acquit the accused was upheld.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

This appeal is instituted against the judgment dated 24.9.2015, rendered by the learned Special Judge (I), Kullu, H.P., in Sessions trial No. 133/2013, whereby the respondent-accused (hereinafter referred to as the accused), who was charged with and tried for offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ND & PS Act), has been acquitted.

2. The case of the prosecution, in a nut shell, is that on 24.5.2013, at 4:00 AM, a team of Special Investigation Unit, Kullu headed by ASI Gangbir Singh was present at Talogi Mod, which falls within the jurisdiction of PS Kullu. They saw accused coming on foot from Jia- Bhunter side carrying a bag in his hand. PW-5 ASI Gangbir Singh asked the accused to explain the reason of his presence at the spot, at such early hours of the day, but accused could not reply satisfactorily. On inquiry, accused disclosed his name and address. The place where the accused was apprehended was secluded and no independent witnesses were available. PW-5 ASI Gangbir Singh associated HHC Uttam Singh (PW-4) and Const. Nikka Ram (PW-6) as witnesses and in their presence, the carry bag, being carried by the accused, was searched. It contained two transparent polythene packets in which transparent plastic wrappings was found which was in the shape of sticks and on smelling and testing, the substance was found to be charas. I.O. PW-5 ASI Gangbir Singh prepared the identification memo Ext. PW-4/A and the recovered charas was weighed. It weighed 1.800 kgs. Thereafter, the recovered charas was again put in the same plastic wrappers and then in same polythene packets and thereafter in carry bag. The carry bag was then sealed in a cloth parcel with eight seals of impression “A” and then taken into possession vide recovery memo Ext. PW-4/C, which was signed by accused as well as witnesses. PW-5 ASI Gangbir Singh took sample of seals of “A” on pieces of cloth, one of which is Ext. PW-4/B. PW-5 ASI Gangbir Singh also filled in the NCB-I form in triplicate vide Ext. PW-3/D. Rukka was scribed and sent to Police Station through HHC Uttam Singh (PW-4), on which FIR Ext. PW-3/A was registered by SI Shiv Singh. PW-3 SI Shiv Singh handed over the case file to HHC Uttam Singh with the direction to take the same to the I.O. The site plan Ext. PW-5/B was prepared by the I.O. and statements of the witnesses were recorded. The accused was apprised about the grounds of arrest. The accused was arrested vide memo Ext. PW-5/C. SI/SHO Shiv Singh resealed the parcel with seal “R” by affixing six seal impressions thereon. He also filled in the relevant columns of NCB-I form and drew sample of seal “R” vide Ext. PW-3/C and thereafter deposited the case property with PW-7 MHC Ram Krishan. MHC Ram Krishan made entries in register No. 19 of the Malkhana at Sr. No. 49, the abstract of which is Ext. PW-7/A. Special report Ext. PW-2/A was prepared. The case property was sent to FSL Junga. The report of FSL Junga is Ext. PW-3/E. The investigation was completed and the challan was put up after completing all the codal formalities.

3. The prosecution, in order to prove its case, has examined as many as 7 witnesses. The accused was also examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C. The learned trial Court acquitted the accused, as noticed hereinabove. Hence, this appeal.

4. Mr. M.A.Khan, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State has vehemently argued that the prosecution has proved its case against the accused.

5. We have heard the learned Addl. Advocate General for the State and gone through the judgment and records of the case carefully.

6. According to PW-4 HHC Uttam Singh, PW-5 ASI Gangbir Singh and PW-6 Const. Nikka Ram, the charas was found in the form of sticks, however, as per the report of the FSL Ext. PW-3/E, on opening the sealed cloth parcel, charas was found in the form of poly wrapped sticks and balls in two transparent zip poly packets. The witnesses





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top