SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 367

SURESHWAR THAKUR
New India Assurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Meera Verma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Anupinder Rohal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Sureshwar Thakur, Judge (Oral).

The truck owned by the respondent herein suffered damage in an accident which occurred on 14.03.2009. Its owner, respondent herein holding qua the ill-fated truck an insurance cover issued by the petitioner herein, instituted a complaint against its insurer before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur. On 21.06.2013, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur dismissed the complaint instituted thereat by the respondent herein on the score of the complainant/respondent herein not falling within the definition of “consumer” rendering hence the complaint instituted before it by the respondent herein being not maintainable. The respondent herein standing aggrieved by the rendition of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur, instituted an appeal therefrom before the H.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Shimla. The latter Court recorded a judgment in affirmation to the rendition of the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur. However, in the operative part of its order, the H.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Shimla reserved liberty to the complaina









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top