RAJIV SHARMA
Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, J.
Since all these appeals arise out of a common judgment and common questions of law and facts are involved in these appeals, all these were heard together and are being decided by a common judgment.
2. These appeals are instituted against the judgment dated 31.8.2007, rendered by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Shimla, H.P. in Sessions Trial No. 18-S/7 of 2004, whereby the appellants-accused (hereinafter referred to as the accused), who were charged with and tried for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 147, 148, 332/149 and 307/149 IPC, have been acquitted under Section 307/149 IPC. However, they were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months each and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 each under Sections 120-B, 147 and 148 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months. They were also convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year each and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each under Section 332/149 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. All the sentences
State of Bihar vs. Nathu Pandey and others.
Chandrika Prasad Singh and others, vs. The State of Bihar
Ranbir Yadav vs. State of Bihar
Bajwa & Ors. v. State of UP. (1973) 3 S.C.R. 571
State of Maharashtra vs. Kashirao and others
K.T.M.S. Mohd. and another vs. Union of India
Bhagwan Swaruop and Ors v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.